| 290 | 2 | 24 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本科教学在高校人才培养中居于核心地位。为全面推进以学生发展为中心的教学改革,需要设计并开展全程、全面、全员参与的教学影响力评估。本文基于近年来复旦大学生命科学学院在新建实验课程中的实践并结合国外相关报道的经验,围绕评估全程、全面和全员参与的三个原则展开讨论。在总结国内外实践经验的基础上,强调了在教学影响力评估中容易被忽视的若干方面,希望能为营造全方位的融合育人氛围提供借鉴。
Abstract：[1]新时代全国高等学校本科教育工作会议:一流本科怎样建成[N].人民日报,2018-06-28.
[2]王洁,等.启发式细胞生物学实验教学的设计与尝试[J].中国细胞生物学学报,2017,39(10):1329-1337.
[3] Ahmad A,etal. The3MNational Teaching Fellowship:findings from a national questionnaire on the impact of the program[J]. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 2017(10):15-26.
[4] Hart D, et al. Exploring stakeholder engagement in impact evalution planning in educational development work[J]. Evaluation, 2009, 75(3):285-306.
[5] Guskey T. Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development[J]. Educational Leadership:Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, N.E.A, 2002, 59(6):1-13.
[6] Morgan D. STEPS-A science test for evaluation of process skills[J]. The Science Teacher, 1971, 38(8):77-79.
[7] Aydogdu B. The investigation of science process skills of science teachers in terms of some variables[J].Educational Research and Reviews, 2015, 10(5):582-594.
[8] Taras M. Summative and formative assessment[J].Active Learning in Higher Education, 2008, 9(2):172-192.
[9]满足人民对更好教育的需要解决好教育发展不平衡不充分问题[N].人民日报,2018-04-04.
[10] Walker P, et al. Skill development and critical thinkinginhighereducation[J]. TeachinginHigher Education, 1999, 4(4):531-547.
[11]赵栓,等.翻转教学在普通生物学教学中的实践[J].高校生物学教学研究(电子版),2018,8(3):11-16.
[12]JohanssonC,etal. Transformingstudents:fulfilling the promise of higher education[J]. The Review of Higher Education, 2015, 38(2):313-315.
基本信息:
中图分类号:G642
引用信息:
[1]蔡亮,胡婧怡,李娜.教学影响力评估的设计与实践[J].中国大学教学,2018,No.339(11):66-71.
基金信息:
复旦大学教师教学发展中心、教育部“基础学科拔尖学生培养计划”研究课题经费(20180202、20160804)资助
2018-11-15
2018-11-15